AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs NVIDIA GeForce 930MX

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and NVIDIA GeForce 930MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1020 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 vs 1293
  • Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 194
  • Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 vs 23.565
  • Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 176.928 vs 165.338
  • Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 vs 1.09
  • Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 vs 2053
  • Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 vs 2053
  • Around 74% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 862 vs 495
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 April 2018 vs 1 March 2016
Boost clock speed 1100 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1894 vs 1293
PassMark - G2D Mark 355 vs 194
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 26.039 vs 23.565
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 176.928 vs 165.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.666 vs 1.09
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2408 vs 2053
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2408 vs 2053
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 862 vs 495

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX

  • 3.2x more core clock speed: 952 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3577 vs 3170
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3577 vs 3170
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 952 MHz vs 300 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 17 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3577 vs 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3577 vs 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1894
1293
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
355
194
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26.039
23.565
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
176.928
165.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.666
1.09
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2408
2053
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3170
3577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2408
2053
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3170
3577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
862
495
Name AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
PassMark - G3D Mark 1894 1293
PassMark - G2D Mark 355 194
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 26.039 23.565
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 176.928 165.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.666 1.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 27.603
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 135.437
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2408 2053
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3170 3577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2408 2053
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3170 3577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 862 495
Geekbench - OpenCL 5494

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient NVIDIA GeForce 930MX

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 Maxwell
Code name Raven GM108
Launch date 23 April 2018 1 March 2016
Place in performance rating 973 1115
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz 1020 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 952 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt
Transistor count 4,940 million
Floating-point performance 783.4 gflops
Pipelines 384
Texture fill rate 24.48 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None None
Bus support PCI Express 3.0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3, GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus