AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and NVIDIA GeForce 930MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 vs 1293
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 194
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 vs 23.565
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 176.928 vs 165.338
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 vs 1.09
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 vs 2053
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 vs 2053
- Around 74% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 862 vs 495
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2018 vs 1 March 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 vs 1293 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 vs 194 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 vs 23.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 vs 165.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 vs 1.09 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 vs 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 vs 2053 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 vs 495 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 952 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3577 vs 3170
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3577 vs 3170
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 952 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 vs 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 vs 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | 1293 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 194 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | 23.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | 165.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | 1.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 3577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 3577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 | 495 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5494 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Raven | GM108 |
Launch date | 23 April 2018 | 1 March 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 973 | 1115 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 952 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | |
Floating-point performance | 783.4 gflops | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 24.48 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |