AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 57% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 55 Watt
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 vs 1359
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 281
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 vs 12.383
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 vs 1.107
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.603 vs 21.761
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 vs 40.703
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 vs 2294
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 vs 2294
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2018 vs 23 July 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 vs 1359 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 vs 281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 vs 12.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 vs 1.107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 vs 21.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 vs 40.703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 vs 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 vs 2294 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 667 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 358.892 vs 176.928
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 vs 3170
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 vs 3170
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.892 vs 176.928 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3605 vs 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3605 vs 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | 1359 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | 12.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | 358.892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | 1.107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | 21.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | 40.703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 3605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 3605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3362 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 | 0 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4464 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Raven | GK106 |
Launch date | 23 April 2018 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 973 | 1105 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $84.95 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.91 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 667 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 2,540 million |
Floating-point performance | 768.4 gflops | |
Pipelines | 576 | |
Texture fill rate | 32.02 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 48.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |