AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 57% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 55 Watt
  • Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 vs 1359
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 281
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.039 vs 12.383
  • Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.666 vs 1.107
  • Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.603 vs 21.761
  • 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 135.437 vs 40.703
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2408 vs 2294
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2408 vs 2294
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 April 2018 vs 23 July 2013
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 55 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1894 vs 1359
PassMark - G2D Mark 355 vs 281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 26.039 vs 12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.666 vs 1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 27.603 vs 21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 135.437 vs 40.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2408 vs 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2408 vs 2294

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

  • 2.2x more core clock speed: 667 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 358.892 vs 176.928
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 vs 3170
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 vs 3170
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 667 MHz vs 300 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 358.892 vs 176.928
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3605 vs 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3362 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3605 vs 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3362 vs 3352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1894
1359
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
355
281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26.039
12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
176.928
358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.666
1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27.603
21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
135.437
40.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2408
2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3170
3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2408
2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3170
3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3362
Name AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1894 1359
PassMark - G2D Mark 355 281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 26.039 12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 176.928 358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.666 1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 27.603 21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 135.437 40.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2408 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3170 3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2408 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3170 3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 3362
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 862 0
Geekbench - OpenCL 4464

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 Kepler
Code name Raven GK106
Launch date 23 April 2018 23 July 2013
Place in performance rating 973 1105
Type Desktop Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $84.95
Price now $159.99
Value for money (0-100) 10.91

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 667 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 55 Watt
Transistor count 4,940 million 2,540 million
Floating-point performance 768.4 gflops
Pipelines 576
Texture fill rate 32.02 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 48.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 3008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus