AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded vs AMD Radeon R9 M385
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded and AMD Radeon R9 M385 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 413 vs 244
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 vs 3322
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 vs 3322
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 vs 244 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 vs 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 vs 3322 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M385
- 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2061 vs 1584
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3002 vs 2433
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3002 vs 2433
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2061 vs 1584 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3002 vs 2433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3002 vs 2433 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M385
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | AMD Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1584 | 2061 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 | 244 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8802 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1514 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2433 | 3002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 | 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1514 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2433 | 3002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 | 3322 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | AMD Radeon R9 M385 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Owl | Strato |
| Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 950 | 722 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4,940 million | 2,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded with others
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5600
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
AMDFirePro V4900
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
IntelIris Graphics 550
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
NVIDIAGeForce 945M
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
NVIDIAQuadro M520 Mobile
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 2
