AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 72% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 758 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 413 vs 338
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 132.07 vs 99.75
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1514 vs 1263
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2433 vs 2409
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 vs 3111
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1514 vs 1263
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2433 vs 2409
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 vs 3111

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 720 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3216 vs 1584
• Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10001 vs 8805
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.081 vs 25.891
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 879.575 vs 365.4
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.823 vs 2.104
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.155 vs 37.17

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1584 3216
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	413 338
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8805 10001
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.891 28.081
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	365.4 879.575
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.104 2.823
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.17 40.155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	132.07 99.75
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2433 2409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6729 3111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2433 2409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6729 3111

Compare specifications (specs)