AMD Radeon Vega 9 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 9 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 9
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 12x more pipelines: 576 vs 48
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1591 vs 1461
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9870 vs 4463
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2591 vs 2475
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2591 vs 2475
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1856 vs 958
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1856 vs 958
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2482 vs 2304
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2482 vs 2304
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 vs 5 September 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Pipelines | 576 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1591 vs 1461 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9870 vs 4463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2591 vs 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2591 vs 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1856 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1856 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2482 vs 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2482 vs 2304 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 409
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 vs 409 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 9
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 9 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 409 | 569 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1591 | 1461 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9870 | 4463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2591 | 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2591 | 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1856 | 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1856 | 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2482 | 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2482 | 2304 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 9 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Vega | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | Vega Raven Ridge | Broadwell GT3e |
Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 | 5 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 811 | 790 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | 48 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 4500 million | 189 million |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | Yes | 1 |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |