AMD Radeon Vega 9 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 9 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 9
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 7.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 110 Watt
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9870 vs 7917
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 vs 9 October 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 110 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 409 vs 408 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9870 vs 7917 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 768 vs 576
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2522 vs 1591
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 2591
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 2591
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 1856
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 1856
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2482
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 2482
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 576 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2522 vs 1591 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 vs 2591 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 vs 2591 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 1856 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 1856 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 vs 2482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 vs 2482 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 9
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Vega 9 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 409 | 408 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1591 | 2522 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9870 | 7917 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2591 | 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2591 | 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1856 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1856 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2482 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2482 | 3335 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Vega 9 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Vega | Kepler |
| Code name | Vega Raven Ridge | GK106 |
| Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 | 9 October 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 811 | 864 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Price now | $169.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 18.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 576 | 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4500 million | 2,540 million |
| Core clock speed | 928 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,425 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 billion / sec | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Vega 9 with others
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200
AMDRadeon Vega 9 vs
AMDRadeon RX 640
