AMD Radeon Vega 9 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 9 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 9

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 915 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 409 vs 225
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 26 Oct 2017 vs 10 March 2014
Boost clock speed 1300 MHz vs 915 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 409 vs 225

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

  • Around 11% higher pipelines: 640 vs 576
  • Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3028 vs 1591
  • Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10102 vs 9870
  • Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 vs 2591
  • Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 vs 2591
  • Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 1856
  • Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 1856
  • Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2482
  • Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2482
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 640 vs 576
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3028 vs 1591
Geekbench - OpenCL 10102 vs 9870
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4938 vs 2591
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4938 vs 2591
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3684 vs 1856
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3684 vs 1856
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 vs 2482
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 vs 2482

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 9
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
409
225
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1591
3028
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
9870
10102
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2591
4938
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2591
4938
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1856
3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1856
3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2482
3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2482
3340
Name AMD Radeon Vega 9 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
PassMark - G2D Mark 409 225
PassMark - G3D Mark 1591 3028
Geekbench - OpenCL 9870 10102
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2591 4938
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2591 4938
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1856 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1856 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2482 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2482 3340
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.828
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 210.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 28.662
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 162.83
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1151

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Vega 9 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

Essentials

Architecture Vega Kepler
Code name Vega Raven Ridge GK104
Launch date 26 Oct 2017 10 March 2014
Place in performance rating 811 898
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1300 MHz 915 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 576 640
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 4500 million 3,540 million
Core clock speed 797 MHz
CUDA cores 1152 or 640
Floating-point performance 1,389 gflops
Texture fill rate 43.4 GTexel / s

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5

Memory

Shared memory Yes 0
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 80.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory type GDDR5
Standard memory configuration GDDR5

Video outputs and ports

7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA