AMD Radeon Vega 9 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 9 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 9
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 915 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 409 vs 225
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 vs 10 March 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 409 vs 225 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 640 vs 576
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3028 vs 1591
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10102 vs 9870
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 vs 2591
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 vs 2591
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 1856
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 1856
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2482
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2482
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 640 vs 576 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3028 vs 1591 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10102 vs 9870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 vs 2591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 vs 2591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 1856 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 1856 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2482 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2482 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 9
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 9 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 409 | 225 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1591 | 3028 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9870 | 10102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2591 | 4938 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2591 | 4938 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1856 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1856 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2482 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2482 | 3340 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.828 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 210.585 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.662 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 9 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Vega | Kepler |
Code name | Vega Raven Ridge | GK104 |
Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 | 10 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 811 | 898 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 915 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | 640 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 4500 million | 3,540 million |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |