AMD Radeon Vega 9 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 9 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 9
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 4.5x more pipelines: 576 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 409 vs 88
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1591 vs 456
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 vs 14 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 576 vs 128 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 409 vs 88 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1591 vs 456 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3315 vs 2482
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3315 vs 2482
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3315 vs 2482 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3315 vs 2482 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 9
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 9 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 409 | 88 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1591 | 456 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9870 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2591 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2591 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1856 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1856 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2482 | 3315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2482 | 3315 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 9 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Vega | Tesla |
Code name | Vega Raven Ridge | G92 |
Launch date | 26 Oct 2017 | 14 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 811 | 1298 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $925 | |
Price now | $925 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.12 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | 128 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 4500 million | 754 million |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 352.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-HE | |
Laptop size | large | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 |