AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition vs AMD FirePro W9100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1382 MHz vs 930 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 409.6 GTexel / s vs 163.7 GTexel / s
- Around 45% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2816
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 13,107 gflops vs 5,238 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 300 Watt vs 750 Watt
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13327 vs 7957
- Around 77% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76021 vs 43046
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.25 vs 106.585
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3611.018 vs 1878.403
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.789 vs 9.751
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.113 vs 82.208
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1373.944 vs 511.115
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12980 vs 9143
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12980 vs 9143
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 26 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1382 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 409.6 GTexel / s vs 163.7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2816 |
Floating-point performance | 13,107 gflops vs 5,238 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt vs 750 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13327 vs 7957 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76021 vs 43046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.25 vs 106.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3611.018 vs 1878.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.789 vs 9.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.113 vs 82.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1373.944 vs 511.115 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12980 vs 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12980 vs 9143 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 762 vs 750
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3718
- 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3356
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3718
- 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 762 vs 750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8219 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32085 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8219 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32085 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | AMD FirePro W9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13327 | 7957 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 762 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76021 | 43046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.25 | 106.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3611.018 | 1878.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.789 | 9.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.113 | 82.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1373.944 | 511.115 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12980 | 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 8219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 32085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12980 | 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 8219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 32085 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7074 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Hawaii |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 26 March 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Place in performance rating | 198 | 191 |
Price now | $999.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.37 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1382 MHz | 930 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 13,107 gflops | 5,238 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 2816 |
Texture fill rate | 409.6 GTexel / s | 163.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 750 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 6,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 275 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |