Intel HD Graphics 500 vs ATI Radeon IGP 345M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 500 and ATI Radeon IGP 345M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 500

• Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 200 MHz vs 183 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 180 nm
• 99.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 299 vs 3

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon IGP 345M

• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 82 vs 81

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 500
GPU 2: ATI Radeon IGP 345M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 3
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	81 82

Compare specifications (specs)