Intel HD Graphics 500 vs NVIDIA NVS 3100M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 500 and NVIDIA NVS 3100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 86% higher texture fill rate: 9 GTexel / s vs 4.85 GTexel / s
- 3.1x better floating-point performance: 144.0 gflops vs 46.98 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 14 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 299 vs 115
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 81 vs 36
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1122 vs 988
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1122 vs 988
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 7 January 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 9 GTexel / s vs 4.85 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 144.0 gflops vs 46.98 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 14 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 299 vs 115 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 81 vs 36 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 579 vs 578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1122 vs 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 579 vs 578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1122 vs 988 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 3100M
- 3x more core clock speed: 606 MHz vs 200 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 16 vs 12
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2905 vs 886
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 606 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 16 vs 12 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2905 vs 886 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 500
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 3100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 500 | NVIDIA NVS 3100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 299 | 115 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 81 | 36 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 886 | 2905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.525 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 35.665 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.215 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.987 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.154 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 488 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 579 | 578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1122 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 488 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 579 | 578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1122 | 988 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 500 | NVIDIA NVS 3100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Apollo Lake GT1 | GT218 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1645 | 1637 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 606 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 144.0 gflops | 46.98 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 9 GTexel / s | 4.85 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 14 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | GDDR3, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |