Intel HD Graphics 5600 vs AMD FirePro D300

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5600 and AMD FirePro D300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D300

• 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 53.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 24
• 6.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19628 vs 2872
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3330
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3330
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3397 vs 1598
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3397 vs 1598

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5600
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D300

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2872 19628
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3330 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3330 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 3397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 3397

Compare specifications (specs)