Intel HD Graphics 5600 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5600 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2264 vs 1191
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 463 vs 399
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2264 vs 1191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 463 vs 399 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 40 vs 24
- Around 77% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5081 vs 2872
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3285 vs 1598
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3285 vs 1598
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Pipelines | 40 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5081 vs 2872 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3285 vs 1598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3285 vs 1598 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5600
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 5600 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2264 | 1191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 463 | 399 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2872 | 5081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1598 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1598 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2095 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2095 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 5600 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Broadwell GT2 | Haswell GT3e |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 746 | 644 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 40 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 392 million |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 10.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Memory type | eDRAM | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |