Intel HD Graphics 5600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5600 and NVIDIA Quadro K4100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 463 vs 324
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3330 vs 3246
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3330 vs 3246
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 23 July 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 463 vs 324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 vs 3246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 vs 3246 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 48x more pipelines: 1152 vs 24
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2736 vs 2264
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9097 vs 2872
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1974 vs 1598
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1974 vs 1598
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2736 vs 2264 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9097 vs 2872 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1974 vs 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1974 vs 1598 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 5600 | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2264 | 2736 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 463 | 324 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2872 | 9097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 | 3246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 | 3246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1598 | 1974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1598 | 1974 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.487 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.985 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.452 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.984 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1105 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1105 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 5600 | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 746 | 1075 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
| Price now | $379.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.50 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 1152 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 3,540 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 67.78 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 5600 with others
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 420
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
ATIFireGL V3600
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4290 IGP
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop)
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 710
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
IntelArc Pro A30M
