Intel HD Graphics 5600 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5600 and NVIDIA Tesla C2075 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 16.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 247 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 463 vs 428
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 25 July 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 247 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 463 vs 428 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075
- Around 92% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 18.7x more pipelines: 448 vs 24
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 2264
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9885 vs 2872
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 1598
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 1598
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 448 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3017 vs 2264 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9885 vs 2872 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 1598 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2075
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 5600 | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2264 | 3017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 463 | 428 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2872 | 9885 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1598 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1598 | 3705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.973 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.623 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.142 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.924 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.747 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2825 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2825 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 5600 | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GF110 |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 746 | 780 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 448 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 247 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 3,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 5600 with others
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 420
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
ATIFireGL V3600
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4290 IGP
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop)
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 710
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
IntelArc Pro A30M
