Intel HD Graphics 6000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 6000 and NVIDIA GeForce 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 6000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 23 Watt
• 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 865 vs 210
• 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 276 vs 59
• Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3554 vs 2474
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3259 vs 1735
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3259 vs 1735

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 320M

• Around 50% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 300 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 320M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	865 210
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	276 59
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3554 2474
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3259 1735
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3259 1735

Compare specifications (specs)