Intel HD Graphics 610 vs Intel HD Graphics 500
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 610 and Intel HD Graphics 500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 26.4 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 144.0 gflops
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 6 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 691 vs 299
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 156 vs 81
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2487 vs 886
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1017 vs 488
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1017 vs 488
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 1 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 26.4 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops vs 144.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 6 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 691 vs 299 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 156 vs 81 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2487 vs 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1017 vs 488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1017 vs 488 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 500
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 579 vs 464
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1122 vs 845
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 579 vs 464
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1122 vs 845
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 579 vs 464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1122 vs 845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 579 vs 464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1122 vs 845 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 610
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 691 | 299 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 156 | 81 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2487 | 886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1017 | 488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 464 | 579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 845 | 1122 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1017 | 488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 464 | 579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 845 | 1122 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.525 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 35.665 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.215 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.987 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.154 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT1 | Apollo Lake GT1 |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 1 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1519 | 1645 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 750 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 144.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 12 |
Texture fill rate | 26.4 GTexel / s | 9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |