Intel HD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GRID K520

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GRID K520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 15x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 225 Watt
• 8x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2x 4 GB
• Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 267 vs 160
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 vs 20.654

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K520

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 76.2x more texture fill rate: 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 27.6 GTexel / s
• 128x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 24
• 11.1x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,448 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3516 vs 1108
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10864 vs 4615
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1063.784 vs 312.246
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.244 vs 1.795
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.277 vs 20.404
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 76.158 vs 32.567
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6782 vs 1859
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 1945
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6782 vs 1859
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 1945

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K520

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1108 3516
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	267 160
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4615 10864
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.948 20.654
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.246 1063.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.795 3.244
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.404 42.277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.567 76.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 6782
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 6782
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3354

Compare specifications (specs)