Intel HD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce 930M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce 930M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 941 MHz
• Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 27.6 GTexel / s vs 22.58 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1108 vs 1013
• Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 266 vs 151
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 vs 22.344
• Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.246 vs 166.907
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 vs 1.225
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.404 vs 19.899

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930M

• 2.7x more core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 64% better floating-point performance: 722.7 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4974 vs 4614
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.246 vs 32.567
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1987 vs 1859
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 1945
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1987 vs 1859
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 1945

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 930M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1108 1013
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	266 151
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4614 4974
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.948 22.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.246 166.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.795 1.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.404 19.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.567 84.246
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 1987
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 1987
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3356

Compare specifications (specs)