Intel HD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 71% higher texture fill rate: 27.6 GTexel / s vs 16.1 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 42.7x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1536 MB
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 267 vs 258
• Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4615 vs 4082
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 vs 11.121
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 vs 1.105
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.404 vs 18.548
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1859 vs 1699
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1859 vs 1699

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M

• 3.9x more core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
• Around 17% better floating-point performance: 518.4 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 1108
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 391.548 vs 312.246
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 32.965 vs 32.567
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2837 vs 1945
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2837 vs 1945

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1108 1237
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	267 258
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4615 4082
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.948 11.121
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.246 391.548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.795 1.105
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.404 18.548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.567 32.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 1699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 2837
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 1699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 2837
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3349

Compare specifications (specs)