Intel HD Graphics P3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P3000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P3000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 26% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 675 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 65 nm
  • Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 82 vs 46
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 February 2011 vs 14 August 2008
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 675 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 65 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 82 vs 46

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 586 vs 287
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3272 vs 1300
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3272 vs 1300
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 586 vs 287
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3272 vs 1300
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3272 vs 1300

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
287
586
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
82
46
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1300
3272
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1300
3272
Name Intel HD Graphics P3000 NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
PassMark - G3D Mark 287 586
PassMark - G2D Mark 82 46
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1300 3272
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1300 3272

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics P3000 NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 6.0 Tesla
Code name Sandy Bridge GT2 G92
Launch date 1 February 2011 14 August 2008
Place in performance rating 1512 1403
Type Desktop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1350 MHz
Core clock speed 850 MHz 675 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 995 million 754 million
Floating-point performance 422.4 gflops
Pipelines 128
Texture fill rate 43.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 10.1 10.0
OpenGL 3.1 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 64.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
PowerMizer 8.0