Intel HD Graphics P4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 636 vs 153
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2461 vs 1876
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2461 vs 1876
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 May 2012 vs 3 March 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 636 vs 153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2461 vs 1876 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2461 vs 1876 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1463 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 576 vs 516
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1463 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 576 vs 516 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics P4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 516 | 576 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 636 | 153 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1071 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2225 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2225 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2461 | 1876 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2461 | 1876 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics P4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Ivy Bridge GT2 | G92 |
Launch date | 14 May 2012 | 3 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 615 | 1256 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1463 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,200 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 374.5 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 562 | |
Pipelines | 128 | |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-IV |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.0 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 61 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD | ||
SLI |