Intel HD Graphics P4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 5.4x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 244 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 636 vs 475
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 May 2012 vs 9 November 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 244 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 636 vs 475 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1544 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 8.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4559 vs 516
- 14.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15466 vs 1071
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2225
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2225
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2461
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2461
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1544 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4559 vs 516 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15466 vs 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2461 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics P4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 516 | 4559 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 636 | 475 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1071 | 15466 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2225 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2225 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2461 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2461 | 3357 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.048 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 872.651 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.378 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.363 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5953 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5953 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 809 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics P4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Ivy Bridge GT2 | GF110 |
Launch date | 14 May 2012 | 9 November 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 609 | 650 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Price now | $289.88 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.21 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1544 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 244 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,200 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA cores | 512 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,581.1 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 49.4 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin and One 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |