Intel HD Graphics P4600 vs AMD FirePro V4900
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P4600 and AMD FirePro V4900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 vs 309
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.915 vs 6.303
- Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.178 vs 0.597
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2013 vs 1 November 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 vs 309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.915 vs 6.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.178 vs 0.597 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V4900
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 84 Watt
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 988 vs 605
- 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12641 vs 3346
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 392.237 vs 146.479
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.874 vs 10.689
- 11x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.818 vs 6.64
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3753 vs 3342
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7745 vs 3345
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3753 vs 3342
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7745 vs 3345
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 84 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 988 vs 605 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12641 vs 3346 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 392.237 vs 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.874 vs 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.818 vs 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3753 vs 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7745 vs 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3753 vs 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7745 vs 3345 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P4600
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V4900
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | AMD FirePro V4900 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 605 | 988 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 | 309 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3346 | 12641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.915 | 6.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 146.479 | 392.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.178 | 0.597 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.689 | 17.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.64 | 72.818 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 | 3753 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 7745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 | 3753 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 7745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics P4600 | AMD FirePro V4900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Haswell GT2 | Turks |
Launch date | 1 June 2013 | 1 November 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 684 | 945 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 392 million | 716 million |
Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops | |
Pipelines | 480 | |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 163 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |