Intel HD Graphics P4600 vs AMD Radeon HD 8870M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P4600 and AMD Radeon HD 8870M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 72% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 725 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 vs 629
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2013 vs 1 April 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 vs 629 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8870M
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1638 vs 605
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9065 vs 3385
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.097 vs 8.915
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 465.496 vs 146.479
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.211 vs 1.178
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.126 vs 10.689
- 16.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 106.848 vs 6.64
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 3342
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 3342
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1638 vs 605 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9065 vs 3385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.097 vs 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.496 vs 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.211 vs 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.126 vs 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.848 vs 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 vs 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 vs 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3345 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P4600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8870M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | AMD Radeon HD 8870M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 605 | 1638 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 | 629 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3385 | 9065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.915 | 24.097 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 146.479 | 465.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.178 | 2.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.689 | 38.126 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.64 | 106.848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics P4600 | AMD Radeon HD 8870M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT2 | Venus |
Launch date | 1 June 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 685 | 726 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt | |
Transistor count | 392 million | 1,500 million |
Compute units | 10 | |
Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 31 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 |