Intel HD Graphics P4600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P4600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4600

  • Around 57% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 797 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 84 Watt vs 122 Watt
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 vs 411
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1250 MHz vs 797 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 84 Watt vs 122 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 963 vs 411

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

  • 2.4x more core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3806 vs 605
  • 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12496 vs 3372
  • 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 vs 8.915
  • 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.616 vs 146.479
  • 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 vs 1.178
  • Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.832 vs 10.689
  • 11.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 78.867 vs 6.64
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3679 vs 3342
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3679 vs 3342
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 823 MHz vs 350 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3806 vs 605
Geekbench - OpenCL 12496 vs 3372
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 39.934 vs 8.915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 705.616 vs 146.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.631 vs 1.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.832 vs 10.689
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 78.867 vs 6.64
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3679 vs 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 vs 3345
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3679 vs 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 vs 3345

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
605
3806
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
963
411
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3372
12496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8.915
39.934
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
146.479
705.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.178
3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.689
13.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.64
78.867
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3342
3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3345
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3342
3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3345
3351
Name Intel HD Graphics P4600 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
PassMark - G3D Mark 605 3806
PassMark - G2D Mark 963 411
Geekbench - OpenCL 3372 12496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.915 39.934
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 146.479 705.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.178 3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 10.689 13.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 6.64 78.867
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3342 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3345 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3342 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3345 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4868
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4868
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1466

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics P4600 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 7.5 Kepler
Code name Haswell GT2 GK104
Launch date 1 June 2013 11 May 2013
Place in performance rating 685 771
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1250 MHz 797 MHz
Core clock speed 350 MHz 823 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 84 Watt 122 Watt
Transistor count 392 million 3,540 million
CUDA cores 1536
Floating-point performance 2,448 gflops
Pipelines 1536
Texture fill rate 102.0 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP MXM-B (3.0)
Bus support PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size large
SLI options 1
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12 API
OpenGL 4.3 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 2500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 0
Standard memory configuration GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
TXAA