Intel HD Graphics P4600 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P4600 and NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel HD Graphics P4600

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4600

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
2.8x lower typical power consumption: 84 Watt vs 235 Watt
5.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 vs 172
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3342 vs 1032
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3342 vs 1032

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 June 2013 vs 12 November 2012
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	84 Watt vs 235 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	963 vs 172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3342 vs 1032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3342 vs 1032

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

2.1x more core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 350 MHz
4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2918 vs 605
4.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16023 vs 3385
5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.455 vs 8.915
11.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1666.354 vs 146.479
5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.836 vs 1.178
8.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 92.472 vs 10.689
41.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 275.229 vs 6.64
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 3345
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 3345

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	732 MHz vs 350 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2918 vs 605
Geekbench - OpenCL	16023 vs 3385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	49.455 vs 8.915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1666.354 vs 146.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.836 vs 1.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	92.472 vs 10.689
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	275.229 vs 6.64
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	7038 vs 3345
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	7038 vs 3345

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

605

2918

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

963

172

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3385

16023

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8.915

49.455

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

146.479

1666.354

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.178

5.836

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10.689

92.472

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.64

275.229

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3342

1032

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3345

7038

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3342

1032

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3345

7038

Name	Intel HD Graphics P4600	NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
PassMark - G3D Mark	605	2918
PassMark - G2D Mark	963	172
Geekbench - OpenCL	3385	16023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.915	49.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	146.479	1666.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.178	5.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	10.689	92.472
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	6.64	275.229
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3342	1032
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3345	7038
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3342	1032
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3345	7038

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics P4600	NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 7.5	Kepler
Code name	Haswell GT2	GK110
Launch date	1 June 2013	12 November 2012
Place in performance rating	685	791
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$7,699
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz
Core clock speed	350 MHz	732 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	84 Watt	235 Watt
Transistor count	392 million	7,080 million
Floating-point performance		3,935 gflops
Pipelines		2688
Texture fill rate		164.0 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		6 GB
Memory bandwidth		249.6 GB / s
Memory bus width		384 Bit
Memory clock speed		5200 MHz
Memory type		GDDR5