Intel HD Graphics P4600 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P4600 and NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 84 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 vs 444
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2013 vs 25 July 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 vs 444 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 574 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1306 vs 605
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.784 vs 8.915
- 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.512 vs 146.479
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.125 vs 1.178
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 10.689
- 14.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 93.533 vs 6.64
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1306 vs 605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.784 vs 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.512 vs 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.125 vs 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 vs 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.533 vs 6.64 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 605 | 1306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3385 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.915 | 24.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 146.479 | 917.512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.178 | 3.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.689 | 44.227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.64 | 93.533 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics P4600 | NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi |
Code name | Haswell GT2 | GF100 |
Launch date | 1 June 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 685 | 762 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,489 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 574 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 392 million | 3,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Pipelines | 448 | |
Texture fill rate | 32.1 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |