Intel HD Graphics P630 vs AMD Radeon Sky 500

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P630 and AMD Radeon Sky 500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P630

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2158 vs 2116
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2158 vs 2116
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 August 2016 vs 27 March 2013
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2158 vs 2116
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2158 vs 2116

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Sky 500

  • 3.2x more core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 53.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 24
  • 2.4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1740 MB
  • 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4764 vs 1184
  • Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 551 vs 317
  • 15.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74902 vs 4933
  • 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3585 vs 979
  • 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3585 vs 979
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5116 vs 3049
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5116 vs 3049
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 950 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 1280 vs 24
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1740 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4764 vs 1184
PassMark - G2D Mark 551 vs 317
Geekbench - OpenCL 74902 vs 4933
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3585 vs 979
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3585 vs 979
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 5116 vs 3049
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 5116 vs 3049

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Sky 500

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1184
4764
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
317
551
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4933
74902
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
979
3585
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
979
3585
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2158
2116
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2158
2116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3049
5116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3049
5116
Name Intel HD Graphics P630 AMD Radeon Sky 500
PassMark - G3D Mark 1184 4764
PassMark - G2D Mark 317 551
Geekbench - OpenCL 4933 74902
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 979 3585
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 979 3585
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2158 2116
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2158 2116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3049 5116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3049 5116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 54.669
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1096.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.352
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 89.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 247.642

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics P630 AMD Radeon Sky 500

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 1.0
Code name Kaby Lake GT2 Pitcairn
Launch date 5 August 2016 27 March 2013
Place in performance rating 1006 510
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 950 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 24 1280
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 2,800 million
Floating-point performance 2,432 gflops
Texture fill rate 76 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort count 1
Dual-link DVI support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Form factor Full Height / Full Length
Length 242 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1740 MB 4 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory 1
Memory bandwidth 154 GB / s
Memory clock speed 4800 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync