Intel HD Graphics P630 vs AMD Radeon Sky 500
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P630 and AMD Radeon Sky 500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2158 vs 2116
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2158 vs 2116
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 August 2016 vs 27 March 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2158 vs 2116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2158 vs 2116 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Sky 500
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 53.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 24
- 2.4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1740 MB
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4764 vs 1184
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 551 vs 317
- 15.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74902 vs 4933
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3585 vs 979
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3585 vs 979
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5116 vs 3049
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5116 vs 3049
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 24 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1740 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4764 vs 1184 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 551 vs 317 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74902 vs 4933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3585 vs 979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3585 vs 979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5116 vs 3049 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5116 vs 3049 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Sky 500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon Sky 500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1184 | 4764 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 317 | 551 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4933 | 74902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 979 | 3585 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 979 | 3585 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2158 | 2116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2158 | 2116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3049 | 5116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3049 | 5116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.669 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1096.68 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.352 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.642 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon Sky 500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 5 August 2016 | 27 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1006 | 510 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 950 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 1280 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 76 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 242 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 154 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |