Intel Iris Graphics 540 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 540 and AMD Radeon HD 6750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 540
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1258 vs 937
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 4 January 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1258 vs 937 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750M
- 2x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 10x more pipelines: 480 vs 48
- 16x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 64 MB
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 323
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9432 vs 6284
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1813 vs 1237
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 3158
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1813 vs 1237
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 3158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 48 |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 64 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 323 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9432 vs 6284 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1813 vs 1237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 vs 3158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1813 vs 1237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 vs 3158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 540
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Graphics 540 | AMD Radeon HD 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1258 | 937 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6284 | 9432 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2308 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1237 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 | 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2308 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1237 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 | 3331 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.363 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 214.155 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.331 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.844 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.439 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Graphics 540 | AMD Radeon HD 6750M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Skylake GT3e | Whistler |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 4 January 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1057 | 1080 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 480 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 716 million |
| Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Graphics 540 with others
IntelIris Graphics 540 vs
ATIRadeon 9100
IntelIris Graphics 540 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 XT
IntelIris Graphics 540 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5700 VE
IntelIris Graphics 540 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5470
IntelIris Graphics 540 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 4000
IntelIris Graphics 540 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8350 OEM
