Intel Iris Graphics 540 vs AMD Radeon R5 230
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 540 and AMD Radeon R5 230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 540
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
- 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1258 vs 222
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 vs 255
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6284 vs 4127
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2308 vs 439
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1237 vs 992
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3158 vs 2480
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2308 vs 439
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1237 vs 992
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3158 vs 2480
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 3 April 2014 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1258 vs 222 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 vs 255 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6284 vs 4127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2308 vs 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1237 vs 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 vs 2480 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2308 vs 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1237 vs 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 vs 2480 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230
- 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
- 64x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 64 MB
Pipelines | 160 vs 48 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 64 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 540
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 230
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Graphics 540 | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1258 | 222 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 255 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6284 | 4127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2308 | 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1237 | 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 | 2480 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2308 | 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1237 | 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 | 2480 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Graphics 540 | AMD Radeon R5 230 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | Caicos |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 3 April 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1057 | 1313 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Price now | $50 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.10 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 160 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 370 million |
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 1.0 x4 | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | N / A | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 4 GB |
Memory type | eDRAM | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 10.67 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
PowerPlay |