Intel Iris Graphics 540 vs AMD Radeon R5 230

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 540 and AMD Radeon R5 230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 540

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
  • 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1258 vs 222
  • Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 vs 255
  • Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6284 vs 4127
  • 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2308 vs 439
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1237 vs 992
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3158 vs 2480
  • 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2308 vs 439
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1237 vs 992
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3158 vs 2480
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 3 April 2014
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1258 vs 222
PassMark - G2D Mark 323 vs 255
Geekbench - OpenCL 6284 vs 4127
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2308 vs 439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1237 vs 992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3158 vs 2480
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2308 vs 439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1237 vs 992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3158 vs 2480

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230

  • 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
  • 64x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 64 MB
Pipelines 160 vs 48
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 64 MB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 540
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 230

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1258
222
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
323
255
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6284
4127
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2308
439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1237
992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3158
2480
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2308
439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1237
992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3158
2480
Name Intel Iris Graphics 540 AMD Radeon R5 230
PassMark - G3D Mark 1258 222
PassMark - G2D Mark 323 255
Geekbench - OpenCL 6284 4127
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2308 439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1237 992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3158 2480
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2308 439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1237 992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3158 2480
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Graphics 540 AMD Radeon R5 230

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 TeraScale 2
Code name Skylake GT3e Caicos
Launch date 1 September 2015 3 April 2014
Place in performance rating 1057 1313
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R5 200 Series
Price now $50
Value for money (0-100) 6.10

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1050 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 48 160
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 19 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 370 million
Floating-point performance 200.0 gflops
Texture fill rate 5 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support PCIe 1.0 x4
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors N / A

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Memory type eDRAM DDR3
Shared memory 1
Memory bandwidth 10.67 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit

Technologies

Quick Sync
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
​PowerPlay