Intel Iris Graphics 540 vs ATI FirePro V4800
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 540 and ATI FirePro V4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 540
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 69 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1258 vs 1204
- 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6284 vs 1670
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2308 vs 1512
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2308 vs 1512
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 26 April 2010 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 69 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1258 vs 1204 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6284 vs 1670 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2308 vs 1512 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2308 vs 1512 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V4800
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8.3x more pipelines: 400 vs 48
- 16x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 64 MB
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 323
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2211 vs 1237
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3326 vs 3158
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2211 vs 1237
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3326 vs 3158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 400 vs 48 |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 64 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 vs 323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2211 vs 1237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3326 vs 3158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2211 vs 1237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3326 vs 3158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 540
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V4800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Graphics 540 | ATI FirePro V4800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1258 | 1204 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 456 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6284 | 1670 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2308 | 1512 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1237 | 2211 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 | 3326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2308 | 1512 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1237 | 2211 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 | 3326 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.886 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 321.782 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.529 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.184 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 56.777 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Graphics 540 | ATI FirePro V4800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Skylake GT3e | Redwood |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 26 April 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1057 | 1092 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $189 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 400 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 69 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 627 million |
| Floating-point performance | 620.0 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Graphics 540 with others
IntelIris Graphics 540 vs
ATIRadeon 9100
IntelIris Graphics 540 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 XT
IntelIris Graphics 540 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5700 VE
IntelIris Graphics 540 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5470
IntelIris Graphics 540 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 4000
IntelIris Graphics 540 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8350 OEM
