Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 550 and AMD Radeon HD 6750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 900 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 86 Watt
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1432 vs 1047
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 305 vs 271
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2675 vs 2100
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2675 vs 2100
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 21 January 2011 |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 86 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1432 vs 1047 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 305 vs 271 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2675 vs 2100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2675 vs 2100 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750
- 15x more pipelines: 720 vs 48
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3378 vs 1290
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3378 vs 1290
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3157
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3157
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 720 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3378 vs 1290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3378 vs 1290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3157 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 550
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | AMD Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1432 | 1047 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 305 | 271 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7182 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2675 | 2100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2675 | 2100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1290 | 3378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1290 | 3378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3157 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3157 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.039 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 544.041 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.867 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.664 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.074 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Graphics 550 | AMD Radeon HD 6750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Skylake GT3e | Juniper |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 21 January 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 953 | 1038 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $49.99 | |
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 33.46 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 720 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 86 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Graphics 550 with others
IntelIris Graphics 550 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8410G IGP
IntelIris Graphics 550 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840A
IntelIris Graphics 550 vs
AMDFirePro W4100
IntelIris Graphics 550 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 945M
IntelIris Graphics 550 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M520 Mobile
IntelIris Graphics 550 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded
