Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 550 and AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1432 vs 261
• 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 305 vs 75
• Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7182 vs 5751

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP

• Around 50% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 1290
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 1290
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3157
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3157

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 550
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1432 261
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 75
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7182 5751
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1290 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1290 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3157 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3157 3359

Compare specifications (specs)