Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7182 vs 5235
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2675 vs 1435
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2675 vs 1435
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 22 April 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7182 vs 5235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2675 vs 1435 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2675 vs 1435 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 824 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 12x more pipelines: 576 vs 48
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1877 vs 1432
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 305
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3531 vs 1290
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3531 vs 1290
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3300 vs 3157
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3300 vs 3157
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 576 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1877 vs 1432 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 vs 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3531 vs 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3531 vs 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3300 vs 3157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3300 vs 3157 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1432 | 1877 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 305 | 430 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7182 | 5235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2675 | 1435 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2675 | 1435 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1290 | 3531 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1290 | 3531 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3157 | 3300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3157 | 3300 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.806 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.51 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.535 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.524 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.664 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Graphics 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | GK106 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 22 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 953 | 964 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 824 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 576 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,540 million |
Floating-point performance | 949.2 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 39.55 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 147 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |