Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 550 and NVIDIA Quadro K3100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7182 vs 6324
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3157 vs 2616
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3157 vs 2616
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 23 July 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7182 vs 6324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3157 vs 2616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3157 vs 2616 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2271 vs 1430
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 vs 305
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3721 vs 2675
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3721 vs 2675
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2502 vs 1290
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2502 vs 1290
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2271 vs 1430 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 vs 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3721 vs 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3721 vs 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2502 vs 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2502 vs 1290 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | NVIDIA Quadro K3100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1430 | 2271 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 305 | 323 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7182 | 6324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2675 | 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2675 | 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1290 | 2502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1290 | 2502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3157 | 2616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3157 | 2616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.239 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 426.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.356 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.251 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.135 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Graphics 550 | NVIDIA Quadro K3100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | GK104 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 951 | 1067 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,999 | |
Price now | $1,999 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 706 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 768 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,084 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 45.18 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |