Intel Iris Graphics 6100 vs AMD FirePro W2100
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 6100 and AMD FirePro W2100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 6100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 680 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 26.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 898 vs 883
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 vs 12 August 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 680 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 400 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 898 vs 883 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W2100
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 630 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 321 vs 314
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1494 vs 1404
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1494 vs 1404
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3715 vs 3028
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2329 vs 1139
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2329 vs 1139
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 630 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 321 vs 314 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1494 vs 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1494 vs 1404 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3715 vs 3028 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2329 vs 1139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2329 vs 1139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3331 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 6100
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W2100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | AMD FirePro W2100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 898 | 883 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 1494 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3028 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1139 | 2329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1139 | 2329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.438 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 289.646 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.991 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.338 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1058 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | AMD FirePro W2100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | Oland |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 | 12 August 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1074 | 1204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 630 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 320 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 400 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
| Floating-point performance | 435.2 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 2 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Low Profile / Half Length | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | n / a | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Powerplay | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Graphics 6100 with others
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 Ultra
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5470
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M500M
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
IntelUHD Graphics P630
