Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs AMD Radeon R5 M240
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD Radeon R5 M240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1347 vs 450
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 340 vs 159
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6440 vs 3721
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2306 vs 881
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1514 vs 1444
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3249
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2306 vs 881
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1514 vs 1444
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3249
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 18 September 2014 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1347 vs 450 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 vs 159 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6440 vs 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 vs 881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 vs 1444 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 3249 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 vs 881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 vs 1444 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 3249 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M240
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 320 vs 48 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M240
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | AMD Radeon R5 M240 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1347 | 450 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | 159 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6440 | 3721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | 881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | 1444 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3249 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | 881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | 1444 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3249 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | AMD Radeon R5 M240 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Jet |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 18 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1159 | 1287 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 320 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | Not Listed | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | Not Listed |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
HD3D | ||
Powerplay | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |