Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs AMD Radeon R7 350

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD Radeon R7 350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 55 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.485 vs 25.507
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2306 vs 2072
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2306 vs 2072

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350

• 2.7x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
• Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7742 vs 6440
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 vs 246.614
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.719 vs 1.888
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.6 vs 21.014
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 109.558 vs 42.981
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3122 vs 1514
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3333
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3122 vs 1514
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6440 7742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.485 25.507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	246.614 647.813
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.888 2.719
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.014 44.6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.981 109.558
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2306 2072
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 3122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2306 2072
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 3122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3358

Compare specifications (specs)