Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs AMD Radeon R7 M440

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD Radeon R7 M440 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1347 vs 906
  • Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 340 vs 174
  • Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6440 vs 5598
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2306 vs 1935
  • Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 2537
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2306 vs 1935
  • Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 2537
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 January 2017 vs 15 May 2016
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1347 vs 906
PassMark - G2D Mark 340 vs 174
Geekbench - OpenCL 6440 vs 5598
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2306 vs 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3333 vs 2537
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2306 vs 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3333 vs 2537

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M440

  • 3.4x more core clock speed: 1021 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2067 vs 1514
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2067 vs 1514
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1021 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 320 vs 48
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2067 vs 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2067 vs 1514

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M440

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1347
906
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
340
174
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6440
5598
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2306
1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1514
2067
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3333
2537
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2306
1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1514
2067
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3333
2537
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 AMD Radeon R7 M440
PassMark - G3D Mark 1347 906
PassMark - G2D Mark 340 174
Geekbench - OpenCL 6440 5598
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 36.485
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 246.614
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 21.014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 42.981
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2306 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1514 2067
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3333 2537
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2306 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1514 2067
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3333 2537
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 720

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 AMD Radeon R7 M440

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 3.0
Code name Kaby Lake GT3e Meso
Launch date 3 January 2017 15 May 2016
Place in performance rating 1159 1114
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1021 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 320
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 3,100 million
Floating-point performance 653.4 gflops
Texture fill rate 20.42 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 DDR3
Shared memory 1 0
Memory bandwidth 16 GB / s
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync