Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
• 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1347 vs 401
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 340 vs 320
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3262
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3262

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650

• Around 67% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1347 401
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	340 320
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3262
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3262

Compare specifications (specs)