Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Intel HD Graphics P530
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Intel HD Graphics P530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 48 vs 24
- 18.8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1740 MB
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1347 vs 1155
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 340 vs 274
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6440 vs 4601
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2306 vs 2014
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1514 vs 767
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 1158
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2306 vs 2014
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1514 vs 767
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 1158
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 1 September 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 24 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1740 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1347 vs 1155 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 vs 274 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6440 vs 4601 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 vs 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 vs 767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 vs 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 vs 767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 1158 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P530
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P530
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Intel HD Graphics P530 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1347 | 1155 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | 274 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6440 | 4601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | 767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | 2014 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | 767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 1158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Intel HD Graphics P530 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Skylake GT2 |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 1 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1159 | 1189 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 24 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1740 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |