Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 11 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
9.4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 141 Watt
64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1346 vs 507
3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 340 vs 88
Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.014 vs 15.56
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3309
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3309

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 January 2017 vs 16 January 2009
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 141 Watt
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1346 vs 507
PassMark - G2D Mark	340 vs 88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	21.014 vs 15.56
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3333 vs 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3333 vs 3309

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

6.1x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 300 MHz
2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.055 vs 36.485
2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.986 vs 1.888
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 108.412 vs 42.981

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1836 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	128 vs 48
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	54.055 vs 36.485
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.986 vs 1.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	108.412 vs 42.981

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1346

507

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

340

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

36.485

54.055

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.888

4.986

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

21.014

15.56

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

42.981

108.412

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3333

3309

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3333

3309

Name	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640	NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
PassMark - G3D Mark	1346	507
PassMark - G2D Mark	340	88
Geekbench - OpenCL	6440
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	36.485	54.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	246.614
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.888	4.986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	21.014	15.56
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	42.981	108.412
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2306
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1514
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3333	3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2306
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1514
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3333	3309
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	720

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640	NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Tesla
Code name	Kaby Lake GT3e	G92B
Launch date	3 January 2017	16 January 2009
Place in performance rating	1159	1307
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$229
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1836 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	48	128
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	141 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	754 million
CUDA cores		128
Floating-point performance		470.0 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Texture fill rate		47.2 billion / sec
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI		S / PDIF
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 2.0 x16
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
SLI options		2-way3-way
Supplementary power connectors		2x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	10.0
OpenGL	4.5	2.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory type	DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4	GDDR3
Shared memory	1
Memory bandwidth		70.4 GB / s
Memory clock speed		1100 MHz
Technologies
Quick Sync
3D Vision
CUDA
SLI