Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 256x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 128 MB
- 32.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1347 vs 41
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 340 vs 173
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 23 October 2003 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 128 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1347 vs 41 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 vs 173 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 425 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 425 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1347 | 41 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | 173 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6445 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Rankine |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | NV36 A1 |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 23 October 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1159 | 988 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 425 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 82 million |
Texture fill rate | 1.7 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |