Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and NVIDIA Quadro K620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 41 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.485 vs 22.112
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.888 vs 1.427
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.014 vs 15.363
- Around 3% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 720 vs 702
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 22 July 2014 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 41 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 vs 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 vs 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 vs 15.363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 vs 702 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2236 vs 1348
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 471 vs 340
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 vs 6431
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 297.631 vs 246.614
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 vs 42.981
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 2306
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 vs 1514
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 2306
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 vs 1514
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2236 vs 1348 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 vs 340 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 vs 6431 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 vs 246.614 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 vs 42.981 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 vs 2306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 vs 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 vs 2306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 vs 1514 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1348 | 2236 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | 471 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6431 | 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | 99.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 | 702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GM107 |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 22 July 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1154 | 970 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
Price now | $189.93 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 41 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |