Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- 256x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 128 MB
- 269.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1347 vs 5
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 340 vs 194
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 19 February 2002 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 128 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1347 vs 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 vs 194 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1347 | 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6440 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kelvin |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | NV25 A2 |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 19 February 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 1159 | 915 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 63 million |
Texture fill rate | 2.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 10.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |