Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs AMD FirePro R5000

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD FirePro R5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 23.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 350 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro R5000

• 2.8x more core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
• Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 625 vs 389
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2647 vs 1727
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 1780
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 1780
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 vs 2992
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 2992

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: AMD FirePro R5000

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	389 625
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1727 2647
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1780 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1780 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2992 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2992 3342

Compare specifications (specs)