Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt

Launch date	10 July 2019 vs 14 November 2018
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 75 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 1150 MHz
3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22421 vs 6390
Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 585 vs 389
2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4809 vs 1727
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3586 vs 1780
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3586 vs 1780
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2992
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2992
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8870 vs 2792
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8870 vs 2792

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1190 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	22421 vs 6390
PassMark - G2D Mark	585 vs 389
PassMark - G3D Mark	4809 vs 1727
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3586 vs 1780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3586 vs 1780
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 2992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 2992
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8870 vs 2792
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8870 vs 2792

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6390

22421

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

389

585

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1727

4809

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1780

3586

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1780

3586

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2992

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2992

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2792

8870

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2792

8870

Name	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645	AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Geekbench - OpenCL	6390	22421
PassMark - G2D Mark	389	585
PassMark - G3D Mark	1727	4809
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1780	3586
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1780	3586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2992	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2992	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2792	8870
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2792	8870

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645	AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Essentials
Architecture	Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake)	GCN 5.0
Code name	Kaby Lake GT3e	Vega 12
Launch date	10 July 2019	14 November 2018
Place in performance rating	813	360
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	1190 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	48
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt
Video outputs and ports
DisplayPort support
eDP 1.2 signal support	Yes
HDMI
Display Connectors		No outputs
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL		4.6
Memory
Memory type	DDR3/DDR4
Shared memory	Yes
Memory clock speed		2400 MHz
Technologies
H265/HEVC Decode
Quick Sync
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface		PCIe 3.0 x16