Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 780 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6391 vs 5635
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 389 vs 338
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1727 vs 935
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2792 vs 1935
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2792 vs 1935
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 5 May 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6391 vs 5635 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 vs 338 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 vs 935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 vs 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 vs 1935 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2380 vs 1780
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2380 vs 1780
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 2992
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 2992
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2380 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2380 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 2992 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6391 | 5635 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 338 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | 935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 2380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 2380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 1935 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Oland |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 813 | 895 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 780 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 730 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | Yes | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
Quick Sync | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |