Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs AMD Radeon R9 370X
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD Radeon R9 370X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 12x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 180 Watt
| Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 27 August 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 26.7x more pipelines: 1280 vs 48
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 1780
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 1780
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 2992
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 2992
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 vs 2792
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 vs 2792
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 1780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 1780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 2992 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 2992 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 vs 2792 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 vs 2792 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370X
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | AMD Radeon R9 370X |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6391 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 8393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 8393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | AMD Radeon R9 370X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Trinidad |
| Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 27 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 813 | 516 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 1280 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 221 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 2100
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 9
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645 vs
AMDRadeon RX 640
